2/25/2023 0 Comments Civ v vs civ iv![]() ![]() In Civ V only individual cities can be puppet cities, but entire civilizations cannot be vassal-states, whereas in Civ IV, a civilization can make an entire civilization into a vassal-state. ![]() ![]() I also like the vassal-state and colony system of Civ IV. I prefer the political system of Civ IV ("civics", which enable a player to change between the policies which they have discovered as technologies) and the simple religious system of Civ IV, more than the political system and the more complicated religious system of Civ V (where the player can make their own religion). a player can put their ships into a port of another civilization, if they have an "open borders" agreement. I like the fact that in Civ IV civilizations can put units on the same square as units from other civilizations, if they are at peace - e.g. Most people also think the combat in Civ V is more realistic, because in Civ IV, any number of units can fit on one square (the "doom stacks" which Keith Fife mentioned), but in Civ V usually only 1 unit can fit on each hexagon. Most people think that Civ V has a more realistic map layout (Civ IV has a square grid, and Civ V has hexagons). I think Civ IV has funnier leader animations, and I love the music in Civ IV. I find Civ IV more fun, and Civ V more serious. I like both games, but I enjoy Civ IV more. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |